Democrats want you to believe that the U.S. Supreme Court is there to do whatever Donald Trump wants. Justice Barrett proves that's not the case.

As the justices took up a case about age verification for online adult content, they struggled to wrap their heads around the ...

Additionally, new users would not be able to access or download TikTok, although people who still have TikTok as an app on ...

Federal Judge Aileen Cannon ordered a Friday hearing to discuss releasing a DOJ report in the dismissed classified document ...

The Supreme Court on Tuesday grappled with the case of Patrick Daley Thompson, a former Chicago alderman and member of Chicago’s most storied political dynasty. Thompson served four months in a ...

The Supreme Court on Tuesday signaled it may send a Chicago political scion’s appeal of his conviction for lying to ...

Chloe Miracle-Rutledge is a JURIST Supreme Court Correspondent and a 2L at Georgetown University Law Center in Washington, DC ...

Justice Amy Coney Barrett appeared skeptical of the ... tradition and the right to work with foreign speakers. Justice Neil Gorsuch was the most sympathetic on the bench to the free speech ...

Justice Samuel Alito asked TikTok creators’ attorney about whether his clients would actually be harmed if TikTok went away ...

If they want to win, Democrats should view themselves not as the minority—but as the opposition. Democrats are now free from the burden of having to govern as the minority in Congress.

"Barrett is a disgrace," Bannon told Newsweek, calling her decision to not halt Donald Trump's sentencing "outrageous." ...